Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
arrowPress Releases
October 24, 2014
PR Newswire
View All





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


Games Beyond Entertainment: Dissecting The 'Evidence' Behind California's Game Law
Games Beyond Entertainment: Dissecting The 'Evidence' Behind California's Game Law
May 19, 2011 | By Dennis Scimeca




When California State Senator Leland Yee proposed his law banning the sale of violent video games to minors, he cited considerable scientific research in defense of his proposition that such games do harm to children.

At the Gamasutra-attended Games Beyond Entertainment conference in Boston, Dr. Paul Ballas challenged whether the results of these research studies validate Senator Yee's argument, as well as the legitimacy of these studies as valid scientific data.

Ballas was a signator on one of the amicus briefs filed against the California law, which were cited by the Supreme Court Justices during the oral arguments heard in November of 2010. He's a psychiatrist who practices in Philadelphia, and deals largely with evaluating children for for psychiatric illness.

Ballas does some consulting work for the video game industry, but has no standing financial ties to the industry.

"If California had decided to ban all video games being played or rented by minors, and they just said 'Our voters desire it, this is something we feel strongly about,' I guess maybe I would write a strongly-worded op-ed to the New York Times or the LA Times, and that would be the extent of my involvement," Ballas said. "But they specifically said that they had psychiatric research [to validate the law]. Psychiatry, unfortunately, has a very long history of being co-opted by political forces to further their own end, and I was concerned that this might be a case of that."

"The difficulty when you make a law based on harm, based on research, is that I believe you have the responsibility to prove that that law will alleviate an aforementioned harm," he continued. “For example, cigarettes cause harm, so let's ban kids from smoking cigarettes, and that will reduce the rate of cancer. Something like that sort of research has to occur, or else you don't really know what you're doing, and I have a problem with using science halfway. You have to either use science appropriately, or not at all."

Ballas dissected three primary studies used by Yee to support his law. The first was published in the Journal of Adolescence by D. Gentile in 2004. It was a study of 607 eighth and ninth grade students, with a mean age of 14, who completed anonymous surveys about the types of video games they preferred, how violent the games were (though the survey did not provide any definition of "violent"), how often the students played the games, the students' hostility levels, how often they had argued with teachers during the past year, their average grades, and whether they had been in a physical fight in the past year. This was all self-reported data, with no corroboration at all.

"I've worked with 14-year-olds long enough to know that if you give them a long list of questions, and they're bored, and there's no downside to making up stuff, they'll just make up stuff," Ballas said. “What's fascinating is that there's stuff that [the study authors] could have absolutely double-checked, like grades. But they didn't do that. They didn't send requests for report cards in this study.”

“I have never, in my few years practicing child psychiatry, asked 'How often have you argued with teachers over the past year?'” Ballas said. “First of all, they have no idea. Second of all, it's a meaningless statement, because I have no idea if they have a horrible teacher or not. I have no idea what the circumstances around those arguments are, so I never ask, because it's not a good measure. I've never heard of a researcher using this as a measure for hostility.”

“Kids and adults are also very poor historians about things that take a long period of time,” Ballas said. “They're not very good at saying 'How long did you sleep last night?' or 'How long did you play video games?' or 'How long were you are school?' You'd be amazed at how bad people are at reporting that stuff accurately. It's very well recognized [by researchers].”

The second piece of evidence was a book published by C. Anderson in 2004 called “Violent Video Game Effect.” It was based on a study of 130 college students, all of whom were over 18. Considering this is offered as evidence to prove the harm done to children by violent video games, this study is problematic without proceeding any further with an analysis of its results. It's not about kids.

Ballas also questions the primary data measured in the study. Anderson's book argues that based on an increase in blood pressure after playing violent video games, that they are harmful to children. “Blood pressure goes up when you do lots of different things,” Ballas said. Musicians, for example, often report a rise in blood pressure whenever they perform. “It doesn't mean that they should stop performing, it just means that they were excited to do that activity.”

The third article was published by Jeanne Funk in 2004. It was a study of 150 fourth and fifth grade children that, according to Ballas, did use reasonable measures to study levels of empathy post-exposure to violent video games. The authors stated at the end of the study, however, that the relationships identified between the source of violence exposure and indicators of desensitization did not necessarily translate into causality. The authors further noted that children with lower empathy scores, and pro-violence attitudes, may simply have just been drawn to violent video games. The study also had a small sample size with no control group for pertinent variables like deviant peer influence and family violence.

In his brief, Yee says that science “confirms that violent video games are harmful to minors.” The evidence that Yee presented in defense of his law does not appear convincing when applied to Ballas's criticism, but the question may become academic as the finding of the Court is set to be announced imminently.


Related Jobs

Gearbox Software
Gearbox Software — Plano, Texas, United States
[10.24.14]

Server Programmer
Giant Sparrow
Giant Sparrow — Playa Vista, California, United States
[10.24.14]

Junior 3D Artist
Giant Sparrow
Giant Sparrow — Playa Vista, California, United States
[10.24.14]

Lead Artist
Amazon
Amazon — Seattle, Washington, United States
[10.24.14]

Event Marketing Specialist, Game Services










Comments


Leandro Pezzente
profile image
Hmmmm .... History tends to repeat itself. Aren't this so called "scientifically based" statements similar to those offered against Comic Books in the pre CCA ( Comics Code Authority" era ?

Leandro Pezzente
profile image
No double blind check ??? Ohh boy ... thats a big NO-NO ...

Alan Rimkeit
profile image
...and Dungeons and Dragons, Heavy Metal, Rap/Hip Hop, Elvis, Swing Dancing, the Blues, ect. These have always been the scape goats of parental failings.

Christopher Engler
profile image
The video game industry needs to stand up for its content with a self-policing mandate instead of intellectualizing away any responsibility it may or may not have in the de-evolution of the world's youth. If game makers don't at least pretend to care about the concerns of parents and politicians, laws like this will continue to be proposed, passed, shot down etc... until something sticks. As flawed as the MPAA is, there's a reason why very few films these days ever are vilified for their gratuitous violence, sex, drug use etc... The film industry has learned to appease these people with an "independent" board that rates these films. The game industry would be wise to adopt a similar model before something much worse (Australia) comes our way.

SDF River
profile image
Isn't the ESRB an "independent" board that rates games?

Mark Harris
profile image
*sigh* Yes, in fact, it is. And Christopher may be surprised to find out that video games sales are by far the most effectively self-policed.



Ignorance is somewhat easily forgivable, so let's hope from now on his arguments take that into account.

Oscar Gamble
profile image
The violent videogame argument with its questionable scientific backing rears up every once in a while, but never seems to gain any steam (pardon the expression). The unconstitutionality will ultimately win out. And yeah, these independent ratings systems for media are flawed, but I don't think the artforms have significantly suffered so much. And there are enough big opponents in the industry that wouldn't take this bill lying down. Bobby Kotick comes to mind.



http://www.askmen.com/specials/2010_top_49/16-bobby-kotick.html


none
 
Comment: