Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
Postmortem: Game Developer magazine
View All     RSS
September 20, 2014
arrowPress Releases
September 20, 2014
PR Newswire
View All





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


 
Postmortem: Game Developer magazine

July 5, 2013 Article Start Page 1 of 3 Next
 

In this postmortem from the final (June/July 2013) issue of the magazine, former Game Developer magazine editor-in-chief Brandon Sheffield turns the critical lens inward to examine the ups and downs of the magazine's 19-year legacy.

Game Developer has had a good run. We started in March 1994 as a quarterly, and moved quickly into a monthly publication as demand grew. Over the years we've seen over two dozen editors, multiple company name changes, four major design overhauls (frankly, there should've been more), and hundreds of articles that have helped developers do their jobs better (we hope).

And now, a few months shy of its 20th birthday, after winning a slew of magazine industry awards, Game Developer is coming to a close, because print is no longer an attractive market.

There was a lot more we wanted to do, and we hoped to be able to serve you for years to come. The magazine was taking more of an indie and small-team bent under Patrick Miller's leadership as the market has shifted in that direction, and we hoped to open a venue for a host of new voices.

As the magazine's longest- running editor, at eight years, I thought it might be fi tting to do a postmortem of the entire operation in this, its fi nal issue. Plus, Patrick and I fi gured that since we had been asking devs to take a frank look at what went right and wrong with their work for so long, it was only fair that we do the same with ours.

What Went Right

1. The "Prestige" of Print

People respected the magazine, which certainly made us editors happy. Often at trade shows we would get comments like "Oh, Game Developer! That's the one publication I read!" Granted, most of these people were getting the magazine for free, but it was clear that people viewed it as respectable (even though most folks outside the U.S. had never heard of it).

No offense is meant to our Gamasutra siblings, but we would often get pitches saying, "Well, I guess I could put this on Gamasutra, but I'd really like to have it in print." For some people, print still had that allure of being "published," and having written something of import. It's almost analogous to the prestige of making a console game -- we grew up with it, so it must be "better," right? This is why so many game developers have blindly put their games on consoles, when other platforms are doing much better. We like history, I suppose!

That went for us editors, too. Every month we would pour ourselves into this thing, staying up late, working overtime, putting final touches and making last-minute edits to ensure the magazine was the best it could be—and at the end of our monthly cycle, we'd have an actual product we could touch. It's a great feeling. Many game developers work for years on a game, and when it's out, they have to start all over again. We got to do this monthly, knowing we were actually creating something.

2. Ties with GDC

As much as I personally wanted to differentiate the magazine from its parent company, I will admit that our ties with GDC were helpful. We got greater visibility at the shows, not to mention a generous ad boost, and it didn't hurt that the higher-ups looked at the magazine as a sort of soft marketing arm for the show. It helped us maintain relevance and ground to stand on as other magazines closed around us. That couldn't last forever, but it helped for a time.

In fact, I think a greater convergence would've been helpful -- turn Gamasutra into gamedeveloper.com, and unite all the properties. But, alas, we will never know!

3. Annual State-of-the-Industry Reports

For over a dozen years the magazine had been running reports like the Salary Survey and the Front Line Awards, which are the only contiguous running reports on game developer salaries and ranking of game development software—period.

Neither of these was perfect, we'll be the first to admit, but there wasn't much better to be done. As my former managing editor Jill Duffy said to me, "We did that shit right by hiring an outside expert to conduct the survey and analyze the results, and it was smart to stick with the same contracted partner year over year."

Since statistics were outside our wheelhouse, for the Salary Survey we used a professional (and expensive!) statistician to sift through thousands of survey responses to bring us valuable data. Some folks have criticized the survey, because they feel the numbers are inflated -- but it's really the best we could have done without somehow getting all dev studios to give us their employee numbers. When that's the sort of industry we work in, we'll all be holding hands and hugging rainbows, and won't need money anyway!

The Front Line Awards are some of the biggest industry awards on the game development software side, and companies actually cared about these things. Epic, for example, has been touting its running tally as best engine for a number of years.

We've had a few other surveys and objective reports throughout the years, and have always done our utmost to make sure they were accurate. A lot goes on behind the scenes with these things, and I think we did quite well with them.


Article Start Page 1 of 3 Next

Related Jobs

Infinity Ward / Activision
Infinity Ward / Activision — Woodland Hills, California, United States
[09.20.14]

Producer - Infinity Ward
Infinity Ward / Activision
Infinity Ward / Activision — Woodland Hills, California, United States
[09.20.14]

Senior AI Engineer
Infinity Ward / Activision
Infinity Ward / Activision — Woodland Hills, California, United States
[09.20.14]

Lead Tools Engineer - Infinity Ward
Infinity Ward / Activision
Infinity Ward / Activision — Woodland Hills, California, United States
[09.20.14]

Senior Tools Engineer - Infinity Ward






Comments


Hubert Rutkowski
profile image
That's the irony - magazine with so much postmortems, now is doing it's own, *real* postmortem.

At one company I had access to free GD's, and was reading them religiously. One because paper implied it has more value (your first point), two because paper was easier for eyes after so much hours spent on PC. Three because it was the time when I concentrated on learning as much as possible, and your magazine helped me with that.

You asked who was reading GD - I'm one from the legion, and I'm feeling a little sorry for you. Good luck with next endeavours.

y h
profile image
That's what I where about to write but saw your post.

Game Developer Magazine making its own PostMortem.

Nick Martin
profile image
All valid points. I just really wish the exit would have been handled a bit better as it transitioned to digital and Gamasutra.

Mark Venturelli
profile image
RIP, GD Magazine. I will miss you, for I was one of your "who are yous" - got my copies shipped all the way to here in Rio : /

Michael Neel
profile image
I subscribed a few issues before the end. I recall in the 90's wanting to subscribe, but not being in the industry I couldn't justify the $200/yr rate for a hobby. Recently I saw an ad for GD Mag and thought, yes I'd love to get game dev news in print every month, and that it was no longer $200/yr!

It's really sad to hear that it was supporting itself yet still shutdown.

Jonathan Murphy
profile image
I have all the issues from 1999 to the last. I need to sell them at some point. 90% in mint condition!

Steven Christian
profile image
I tried the app once; I bought 1 issue; it was terrible; I couldn't find the pdf version.
I gave up and never looked back; Gamasutra serves my needs quite well.

Brian Kirk
profile image
I only recently got into the business (albeit not directly), and I only recently started reading the mag. Great stuff, and I'm sad to see it go. Best of luck to everyone involved!


none
 
Comment: