Gamasutra is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
February 22, 2020
arrowPress Releases

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

Judge rules in favor of Tetris Company in cloning dispute

Judge rules in favor of Tetris Company in cloning dispute

June 19, 2012 | By Mike Rose

In a move that has big implications for video game clone claims, a judge has ruled in favor of the Tetris Company against Mino developer Xio Interactive, stating that Mino is substantially similar to Tetris.

Mino was released for iPhone in 2009, and described by the developer as a multiplayer version of Tetris. The Tetris Company filed a lawsuit against Xio later that year, alleging that Mino infringed on its copyrights.

Xio argued that Mino only copied non-protected elements from Tetris, including the rules and functionality of the game, rather than its expressive elements.

However, the U.S. District Court of New Jersey has now ruled that there is a "substantial similarity" between Tetris and Mino, and that Xio has infringed on Tetris Company's copyright. It also stated that Mino constituted unfair competition for Tetris and false endorsement.

The filing explains, "Neither party disputes that a game is deserving of some copyright protection," before adding, "The game mechanics and the rules are not entitled to protection, but courts have found expressive elements copyrightable, including game labels, design of game boards, playing cards and graphical works."

It continues, "Xio is correct that one cannot protect some functional aspect of a work by copyright as one would with a patent. But this principle does not mean, and cannot mean, that any and all expression related to a game rule or game function is unprotectible. Such an exception to copyright would likely swallow any protection one could possibly have; almost all expressive elements of a game are related in some way to the rules and functions of game play."

"Tetris Holding is as entitled to copyright protection for the way in which it chooses to express game rules or game play as one would be to the way in which one chooses to express an idea."

The ruling may have implications for other alleged clone lawsuits, including the ongoing Spry Fox versus 6Waves Lolapps filing.

Related Jobs

ArtCraft Entertainment, Inc.
ArtCraft Entertainment, Inc. — Austin, Texas, United States

Data Analyst
Health Scholars
Health Scholars — Westminster, Colorado, United States

3D Artist
Health Scholars
Health Scholars — Westminster, Colorado, United States

3D Animator
Purdue University
Purdue University — West Lafayette, Indiana, United States

Assistant Professor in Game Development and Design

Loading Comments

loader image