Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
October 31, 2014
arrowPress Releases
October 31, 2014
PR Newswire
View All

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

Sizing up a history of hardware launch review scores Exclusive
Sizing up a history of hardware launch review scores
December 14, 2012 | By Matt Matthews

December 14, 2012 | By Matt Matthews
More: Console/PC, Business/Marketing, Exclusive

A few days ago my column focused on hard retail sales figures for the U.S. Wii U launch. Now I want to look at something decidedly less rigorous: launch game review scores.

Review scores are already a contentious subject amongst game developers, publishers, marketers, media, and ultimately the consumers themselves. For today, let us just put aside those arguments, consider it as a data set - a somewhat messy data set.

The data here was gleaned from the review aggregators Metacritic, for newer games, and GameRankings, for older games.

The systems shown here represent a 17 year period in the video game industry, and a tremendous amount has changed over that time. When the original PlayStation launched in 1995, the video game industry was much smaller than today, and the number of reviews for those early systems is quite small. The reliability of the data really starts around the time of the Sega Dreamcast, but I've included the PlayStation and Nintendo 64 as interesting artifacts.

I should mention that I took a rather liberal view of Nintendo 64 launch games. I've included everything that launched in 1996. After all, only Pilotwings 64 and Super Mario 64 were available the day the system came out in the U.S.

The data for the latest system, Nintendo's Wii U, is still changing. Just this week, several more reviews were recorded for some of the system's games. But as the number of reviews for each game goes up, the average review score begins to settle down. In many cases there are already dozens of reviews for each Wii U game, so the averages shown here are at least a strong indicator of where the average will end up eventually.

Finally, I've not tried to measure digitally-distributed launch games. So anything that launched on Xbox Live, PlayStation Network, or Nintendo's eShop hasn't been considered.

With all that out of the way, let's just get down to the numbers and graphs.

In the figure below I've shown the consoles released in the U.S. since 1995 from top to bottom in release order.

The bar itself shows the spread of the scores, from the lowest average score to the highest. The purple dot in each bar shows the average score across the system's launch games. Further, the color of the bar indicates the platform holder. Blue is Nintendo, red is Sony, green is Microsoft, and orange is Sega.

This particular view shows that the last three systems released in the U.S. market, the PlayStation 3, Wii, and Wii U, all had an extraordinarily wide spread of launch review scores. The PlayStation 3 and Wii U are also noteable for having their launch game review averages skewed toward the upper end of the range of all their review scores.

On the other hand, the Xbox 360 and the GameCube both had an exceptionally narrow range of review scores for their launch titles. Also, we can see that the Dreamcast had the fortune of having the best-reviewed launch game ever, SoulCalibur. The second-best was Halo: Combat Evolved on the original Xbox.

If we sort the systems by their launch review averages, we get the following figure.

An interesting split appears between the Wii U and Wii and Nintendo's earlier systems. The GameCube has the best-reviewed launch slate of any system while the Nintendo 64 comes in third behind the Xbox 360. Yet the Wii is near the bottom, near the PlayStation for which little data is available. And the Wii U is currently just above the Wii, albeit with a lower maximum and a much lower minimum.

There is perhaps a discussion to be had there about what that means. Does it represent a cultural shift away from Nintendo and its brand? Have reviewers simply become more discerning? Or, perhaps we can point to an increasing number of licensed titles and sequels as dragging generally on the novelty of a system's launch. I'm at least willing to ascribe some of the Wii's lower scores to both developers not quite knowing how to utilize motion controls and reviewers not knowing how to score motion control games.

Finally, I thought it might be interesting to look at the number of games released at launch for each of these systems.

The Wii U has had the most titles available at retail for launch since the PlayStation 2 over 12 years ago. Before it launched, the Wii held that particular spot. And for the Wii U, this total doesn't count the handful of titles available exclusively online in Nintendo's eShop.

The GameCube and Nintendo 64, both of which had highly-respected launch titles, also managed to have nearly the fewest.

So it does appear that Nintendo and its third-party partners have spent some effort to offer more software at launch. It will be interesting to see how Microsoft and Sony manage the software for their launches, which I currently expect sometime in late 2013.

In fact, the Wii U could be the last major system whose main method of distribution is through retail. When new Sony and Microsoft consoles arrive, the average early adopter will likely also be a heavy network services user. When that happens, the distinction between retail and digitally-distributed software will largely disappear.

Related Jobs

InnoGames GmbH
InnoGames GmbH — Hamburg, Germany

Mobile Developer C++ (m/f)
The College of New Jersey
The College of New Jersey — Ewing, New Jersey, United States

Assistant Professor - Interactive Multi Media - Tenure Track
Next Games
Next Games — Helsinki, Finland

Senior Level Designer
Activision Publishing
Activision Publishing — Santa Monica, California, United States

Tools Programmer-Central Team


Evan Combs
profile image
Something I found interesting. It appears that the console whose launch titles get the lowest average review in each generation also seem to be the console that sells the most. Just an interesting correlation that seems to be consistent for some reason.

Leif Peterson
profile image
They also seem to be the console with the most games available at launch too.

John Gordon
profile image
Having a variety of titles seems to correlate with sales. Having a variety of titles also seems to correlate to lower average review scores. Conclusion: review scores do not contribute to a console's success. Having a variety of games is what contributes to a console's success.

profile image
One could go farther than that and say the one with the most games that hit the right core markets and the qurick games that show experimentation with the gameplay or system UI sells the most.

Ian Uniacke
profile image
Cameron you hit the nail on the head. It's almost like I expect to see a review like "Just Dance: Worst FPS ever. 1/10".

David Campbell
profile image
I would be more interested in a weighted version of this data considering only the top X games for the platforms or trimming games below a certain score.

Hypothetical System A has three 90% games.
Hypothetical System B has three 90% games, a 95% game, and a 50% game.

System B clearly had the better launch, although the average (90 vs 83) would disagree. Although defining outliers can be subjective, I would think you'd end up with more relevant results if done carefully.

wes bogdan
profile image
When everything goes digital how will or must things change before they can be ranked,counted. The only downside to a full on digital gaming world is that a 7+gb game must be dl before play and with christmas here unraping a money card then going to a store to enter a code and choose a period of time to wait before your able to play seems less instant gratification than unraping game x and having instant access to it.

The only way to avoid digital woes is for EVERYONE to get superfast CHEAP internet with no throtling or bandwith caping
then things like sony's genkai could stream a game like netflix does a movie and perhaps even allow a background dl and install to play when psn goes down for maitinence.

wes bogdan
profile image
Well obviouslly everyone shouldn't pinch the same straw the streamed game should be sent to a closer relay point for pacific time,mountain,central or eastern time located more closely to the gamers there and there needs to be a backup for any downtime while maintenence is performed unless you can rotate servers taking some down while using others because there would be no gaming if another great psn outage happened without being able to dl/install a game which could be temporary which would be erased when streaming resumed.

There are many options and many solutions but i expect both xblm and psn to be on this before release of their next boxes.

Eventuially we might not need consoles as we see them today or pc's just a roku sized puck which would have portals to sony,nintendo and xbox everything including the dash would be stored somewhere which would allow you to log in access and play for a netflix like sum......dlc would be an on/off depending on if you bought it or not but big boxes with disc's and $399-$599 pricing aren't what i call the future as a $99 roku sized puck where the heavy lifting is done on server farms

Bob Johnson
profile image
Different audiences than gaming sites. Leads to lower review scores especially on more mainstream casual gamer titles.

3rd parties gradually put out worse crap on Nintendo platforms because their platforms gradually sold worse which brings down the average scores or in the Wii's case they just couldn't commit to doing something that wasn't going to be multi-platform so they put out crap.

I too noticed that many systems with the best scores did the worst. The 360 bucked the trend the most.