Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
November 1, 2014
arrowPress Releases
November 1, 2014
PR Newswire
View All
View All     Submit Event

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

Satisfying the Player
by Seth Sivak on 05/05/10 12:19:00 pm   Expert Blogs

The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutra’s community.
The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company.


What do we, as game developers, give the player as a reward for playing our game? How can we leave our players satisfied?  The rise of the casual and social revolutions in games have focused even more on this issue, and have left many of us wondering "Why do people play Farmville?"

I am not here to discuss what makes Farmville compelling, if you are interested you should check out Fear and Loathing in Farmville or Cultivated Play: Farmville.

I want to talk about satisfaction, and how to leverage all aspects of your game towards satisfying your player.

Games are built on a cycle, without going into too much detail, it breaks down into three main steps: challenge, work, and reward.  The game presents a challenge, the player does work to complete the challenge and the game gives the player a reward.  By looking into how the player interacts with these elements we can hopefully find ways to make them more satisfying. I will try to give a few examples.

How can I make the challenge of the game more satisfying?

Make understanding, discovering, or completing the challenge of the game more satisfying. 

Whenever I think of something challenge focused, I think of the Rubik's Cube.  It is not really fun to actually finish the puzzle, but it is fun to understand it.  Once you know how to solve it, doing the actual work to finish it becomes trivial.  The challenge itself is not the only important factor to consider. It is also important to think about how the challenge is communicated to the player, how deep the challenge is and how the player will feel when they complete it.

How can I make the work of the game more satisfying?

Make doing, planning, or mastering the work of the game more satisfying. 

I always consider the work as being the moment-to-moment gameplay of a game.  The perfect example of satisfying work is Guitar Hero or Rock Band: the song you play is always the same notes, but it is fun to do over and over.  The more you play, the better you become.  There is a sense of mastery that is satisfying, think about the moment you get 5-Stars on Free Bird.  Doing the actual "work" can be satisfying in a game, but there is also the opportunity to add in a sense of mastery.

In other games, especially strategy games, the moment-to-moment gameplay is much different.  The act of placing your pieces during each move in Chess is not inherently fun.  Most of the fun in Chess comes from considering and planning out your next three, seven or 200,000 moves.  This level of thought and prediction produces surprises, which make the game exciting and fun. 

How can I make the reward of the game more satisfying?

Make receiving, having, wanting the reward of the game more satisfying. 

The reward in your game should be inherently satisfying, but this is often not the case. Many games struggle with giving meaning and context to the reward, especially incremental rewards. In the Legend of Zelda games Link must go and find dozens of items to help him throughout his quest.  Usually when Link receives an item, the player has no idea what it will be used for, and the entire time he was searching for it he had no idea what it would be.  These games do an amazing job of showing the player that this reward is valuable by making the act of receiving the reward satisfying.  The iconic sound effect and reaction from Link (jump to 3:30) makes even the slightest reward feel amazing.

With any luck, this will help make your game better.  This list of ways to consider each aspect of a game is not exhaustive, and I am sure there any many others (email me: sjsivak at gmail do com).  The goal of this idea is to look deeper into these aspects and try to understand the various components of each one.   I think the more we can understand what satisfies the player, the stronger our game experiences will become.

Related Jobs

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute — Troy, New York, United States

Assistant Professor in Music and Media
The College of New Jersey
The College of New Jersey — Ewing, New Jersey, United States

Assistant Professor - Interactive Multi Media - Tenure Track
Next Games
Next Games — Helsinki, Finland

Senior Level Designer
Magic Leap, Inc.
Magic Leap, Inc. — Wellington, New Zealand

Level Designer


Mark Sivak
profile image
As another great example of satisfaction and feedback I invite everyone to play Gears of War or Gears of War 2 and get a head shot with the Longshot. To this day watching the guy's head pop like a balloon still brings a smile to my face.

It is a combination of great sound/visual effects for feedback and a skilled action by the player that makes it a very satisfying part of the game.

Kai Yi
profile image
I pretty agree with you about your opinion that games have 3 steps, which are challenge, works and rewards. Because of these factors players love the game. Moreover, you talk about giving the players a sense of mastery can more satisfy the players. I also agree with that. However, in my opinion, different games should adopt different ways to satisfy players, or they may lose their players. What I am saying is that different games have different focus and have different fans. Not all players like to compete with someone. Some players may just be satisfied by collecting something. Some players may be satisfied by finish tasks in teamwork. Furthermore, if the players are good a game because they play the game more times than other players, it is very unfair in the online games. For example, if one player challenges the other player in the WOW, they have the same level, although the former play more times than the latter, they won’t absolutely win it. I mean that if the player who plays longer than the other player they can absolutely win, the game will lose the players by degrees because there is no suspense in the game.

Yi Joyce
profile image
We can provide u official nba,mlb,nfl,nhl jerseys.

All the jerseys are in high quality and low price.

If u have any interests about it,u can contact me:

Welcome to contact me,thanks

Yi Joyce
profile image
We can provide u official nba,mlb,nfl,nhl jerseys.

All the jerseys are in high quality and low price.

If u have any interests about it,u can contact me:


Welcome to contact me,thanks

Rafael Vazquez
profile image
Cool post! You know, this rings a similar bell to what Scott Rigby & Richard Ryan said when measuring player need satisfaction; basically there are three atributes that can be satisfied:

competence- which is a sense of mastery and relates to what you explained about making the work satisfying.

Autonomy- which is the sense of beign the master of one's actiones and plans (and relates to making the challenge satisfying)

And finally relatedness, which comes about when the player is given positive contextual feedback for his actions (basically rewards).

For a game to really satisfy the player, it would need to have a high degree of satisfaction in all three areas. What really concerns me, and has tickled at my brain for quite some time, is how do we manage to measure palyer satisfaction for a given mechanic. Anyone got ideas?

Vinicius Bruno
profile image
So, I think like this: You have to put a something like a balance between risks and challenges. Of course, a risk can be a challenge, but if you balance in terms of "how much" put one more than other, a risk can be more easy in the next phase, after a big challenge to the player in this phase, like Defense Grid or World of Goo, basically. I didn't play very much the two, but I played several times some phases of each one.

I hope this can be helpful.

That's what I think, anyone got other ideas?