Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
August 20, 2014
arrowPress Releases
August 20, 2014
PR Newswire
View All
View All     Submit Event





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


 
Emergence, Puzzles, and Playtesting
by Lewis Pulsipher on 07/14/14 08:23:00 am   Expert Blogs   Featured Blogs

The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutra’s community.
The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company.

 
 


Below I've included the text of the slides from this presentation.  If you only read this text and don't listen to the screencast, you won't know what I said.  If you comment based only on the text, you'll be like someone who reads a detailed table of contents for a book and then comments as though he read the book - doh!  It will be like modern functional illiterates who skim a document and then think they know what it said.  They miss all the details and nuance that make the document specific and "accurate"; if it wasn't needed, there would only be an outline/table of contents, and no document.  In this case, there would be no video.

Emergence, Puzzles, and Playtesting
Dr. Lewis Pulsipher
Pulsiphergames.com
Courses.PulsipherGames.Com


What is emergent behavior?
Behavior in a game not anticipated or intended by the designer:
Some of this will be undesirable and require adjustment in the game (e.g., turtling, camping, dominant strategy)
For a game with more than one player, with human opposition, there will be lots of emergence
Humans are great sources of variety and ingenuity
For a single-player game, there will be less, especially if there’s one always-correct solution
Extreme video game example: “rocket jumping”


Can this happen in puzzles?
A pure puzzle has one (or occasionally more) always-correct solutions
In a pure puzzle, the designer devises the solution
In a game, the designer devises the situation, players figure out solutions according to the circumstances
Hence emergent behavior in a puzzle may be undesirable
And is unlikely in a pure puzzle
To a greater or lesser extent, most single-player games (no human opposition) have always-correct solutions, and emergent behavior is undesirable


Playtesting seen as a search for undesirable emergence
Playtesting is a search for what isn’t working (as the designer wishes)
So a lot of the purpose of playtesting is to change the game to eliminate undesirable emergent behavior
PT also shows what does work – which could involve emergent behavior
Game or complex puzzle, there will be lots the designer did not anticipate or intend


Game designers want emergence
Up to a point
Game designers tend to set up a situation where players “write their own stories”
So GD LIKE variations, as long as those don’t ruin the experience
Big contrast with puzzle designers and story writers


What’s other Desirable emergence?
I really like to see, in my games, players adopt their own objectives
Example: pirates game, win condition is “possess most loot when game ends” yet:
Some players like to amass the biggest fleet
Some try to capture the Spanish Silver Fleet (very difficult)
Or try to capture a Ship of the Line (may be even more difficult)
No one has ever captured the Santissima Trinidad (132 guns)
Most likely to happen, I think, in games where story (but not imposed story) is an obvious component
Players choose to make their own story


More Desirable Emergence
The most common desirable emergence would be new strategies that “also” work, rather than replace, the ones the designer intended
Other desirable emergence might be additional interaction amongst players
In a sense, a game designer can be less a “control freak” than a puzzle designer or story designer.  “Bring on the variety” says the game designer


Game Writers DO NOT want emergence
They want to control the course of the story, or decide when deviation/variation is allowed
All traditional story-telling is linear
Too many possibilities in video games means too much “content” for all the branching decisions, making the game far too expensive
This desire to control naturally derives from single-player games, not from games with multiple sides


See my separate video on my “Game Design” YouTube channel, “Are you a game designer or a fiction writer” (also on this blog)

Lots of different ways to conceive of “games”, aren’t there?


Related Jobs

InnoGames GmbH
InnoGames GmbH — Hamburg, Germany
[08.20.14]

Quest Writer (m/f) for The West
InnoGames GmbH
InnoGames GmbH — Hamburg, Germany
[08.20.14]

Game Designer Tribal Wars (m/f)
Mobilityware
Mobilityware — Irvine, California, United States
[08.19.14]

Senior UI Artist
The Digital Animation and Visual Effects School
The Digital Animation and Visual Effects School — Orlando, Florida, United States
[08.19.14]

Instructor - Video Game Asset Production






Comments



none
 
Comment: