Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
September 23, 2014
arrowPress Releases
September 23, 2014
PR Newswire
View All





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


 
Dot Console...
by Jon Brown on 04/06/10 07:21:00 am   Expert Blogs   Featured Blogs

The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutra’s community.
The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company.

 

When I was a kid, consoles were typified by their ease of use - plug in + tune the TV = play = joy. It was always easy to understand the mass market appeal of such simplicity. From the 2600 to the PS2 the paradigm of plug-in-and-play was persistent. And then things began to change...

Microsoft really shook things up when they attached a mass storage device and online capability to the Xbox as standard. When this was announced many developers that I knew had one response in two different tones of voice: "Now console games can be patched!"
 
On the one hand this meant that console development could be slightly less stressful, on the other hand we all knew that it was the "it just works" nature of console games that made them so much more popular than PC games. Thankfully, Microsoft didn't allow us to patch, and things carried on as normal for a while.

However, anyone who owns a PS3 or 360 will know that "pick up and play" isn't always the case anymore. I worked with a tester who had the misfortune of owning an Xbox 360 without an internet connection at home. When he bought BioShock he couldn't play it until he brought the console to work to grab the requisite update. Yes, he could have just brought the hard drive, but that didn't occur to him until after the event. Your PlayStation 3 is also a mighty device but it likes to keep you waiting - "Can I just play Mr Sony?" No, you can't, gulp down your download first.

There is nothing fundamentally wrong with the practice of system updates but it unquestionably hampers the breadth of appeal of these systems in the marketplace. These delays to play are a blocker to enjoyment and create an impression of complexity in the simple world of consoles. Even though this impression is wrong and the consoles are really very easy to use, the damage is done and those mass market consumers simply look for some other way to spend their money and minutes.

Of all the many things that a mass market consumer can turn their attention to, the web is probably the cleverest. Of course, one of the things that you can do on the web is play games, and a lot of people do play games on the web, tens of millions in fact. The great advantage of these games is that all you need is a web browser. Occasionally you have to update Flash or Java but not very often.
 
And these games can be played on any computer you can get my hands on - in the library, at work (during lunch, of course), at home, even at your parents' house when you visit them. I'm ashamed to say that I once played Urban Dead for ten minutes when I was at a friend's house, on his laptop, when I was meant to be looking up a menu for a restaurant. These are coffee break games in terms of intended time investment, it just happens that the coffee break is sometimes longer than expected.

It would seem that the web has become the new standard in insta-play gaming of the kind that we used to turn to consoles for, in that you can fire up a browser and be playing almost instantly. Although, the web might actually be better than anything we've had before. One of the problems that consoles have always had is that they hog the focus of every living room, stealing the television away from other activities.
 
This can be easily remedied with a second TV in the bedroom, but that takes the console away from the living room and sidelines it as a family entertainment option. But the web can be accessed through laptops and even smart phones, devices with their own screens that are portable, bringing them back into the living room without stealing the attention hungry TV's thunder.
 
So we want devices that are good for browsing the net then? Some people didn't seem to think so in January: If you’d told me a few years ago that the announcement of a completely portable touchscreen computer as compact as a magazine would be greeted by dismissive groans and outright mockery I would have questioned your sanity with relatively strong words. Well, the iPad did get that reception from some but it's here now and apart from the fact that it doesn't run Flash, which sickeningly discriminates against Kongregate, it strikes me as a perfect web browsing device, which in turn makes it a perfect device for playing web games.
 
Will it change the nature of gaming? I don't know, but the greatest joy in gaming for me has always been a social context, where the people I'm playing against are close enough to curse or hit. The iPad fits nicely in the social space of the living room, just like board games do, and like its little brother it's certainly worth showing off, which I reckon makes it the very first commercially available coffee table computer.

Related Jobs

Machine Zone
Machine Zone — Palo Alto, California, United States
[09.23.14]

Game Designer
Raven Software / Activision
Raven Software / Activision — Madison, Wisconsin, United States
[09.23.14]

Lead Engineer - Raven
Respawn Entertainment
Respawn Entertainment — San Fernando Valley, California, United States
[09.22.14]

Senior Systems Designer
Retro Studios - Nintendo
Retro Studios - Nintendo — Austin, Texas, United States
[09.22.14]

RETRO STUDIOS - Level 3 Engineer






Comments


Christopher McLaren
profile image
Segmentation of the market. Good and bad news as you have managed to point out here very well. For me the SNES and PS2 were the highlights and showed how to do it properly. Internet gaming is killing the console industry as the lines between console and PC are being blurred.

Chad Wagner
profile image
I'm glad you brought up the correlation between iPad and board games -- that was the first thing I thought when I saw it: "Finally, we can all sit around and interact with a central, portable board." I hope we see many games developed for it that remove the fiddly bits and tedius calculation from board games -- but still include the group interactivity. Perhaps we can even introduce some sort of pieces that can be placed on top and sensed in some manner!



I love the new Scrabble that lets you use your iPhone as your letter rack, and the iPad as the shared board. Awesome! More!

Kyle Jansen
profile image
From my experience, the Wii is still very "pick-up-and-play". The only time I remember patching anything was the first time I played Brawl, and it updated the system software. Took less than a minute, one time. You may not like other things about the console, but Nintendo still recognizes the benefit of instant-readiness.

[User Banned]
profile image
This user violated Gamasutra’s Comment Guidelines and has been banned.

Soren Nowak
profile image
Does any real world numbers point to that consoles are being killed by anything?

Christopher McLaren
profile image
Simply my opinion that what I consider as a console has been slowly replace (killed) by using the internet services available. If this option wasn't available then Bob is right that publishers wouldn't have the option to rush development and correct the problems later.

Maurício Gomes
profile image
This thing of internet killing console, is funny like the music: "The TV killed the Radio Star", where actually Radios are still well and alive today.

David Hottal
profile image
I think we're just seeing the evolution of the console. Consoles are basically personal computers, but they're all the same. All the specs are the same (aside from hard-drive capacity), everyone is on equal footing.



Compared to a PC, consoles are still relatively pick up and play. I do agree that it's a huge pain when you sit down to play a game and you have to spend 20 minutes patching it.



The good thing, though, is that you're never going to be the one person left out, unable to play. Have you ever had a PC problem where you were the only one of your friends with the issue? Everyone else is playing, and you're on message boards, calling the manufacturer, and updating all your hardware.

David Clair
profile image
"This thing of internet killing console, is funny like the music: "The TV killed the Radio Star", where actually Radios are still well and alive today. "



Video killed the radio star... is actually a interesting statement. Video did not kill radio itself, but changed the direction of radio entertainment (when was the last time you listened to a radio "sitcom" or "dramatized" play etc) the radio changed to mainly feature news/talk shows, music programs and sports boradcasts.



This same type of change is happening to Video Games as the internet is altering the "standards" of what games and systems would/could provide to its consumers. (specifically thinking, Online Multiplayer, DLC, Updates/Patches, multiple uses for systems other then strictly games).



Are the changes good or bad? It may be too soon to really tell... since this is really the first console gen where alot of these "features" have been given prominence.


none
 
Comment: