My Message close
GAME JOBS
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
May 24, 2013
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America - Santa Monica
Sr Game Designer
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America - Santa Monica
Senior Staff Programmer
 
Trendy Entertainment
Gameplay Producer
 
Trendy Entertainment
Technical Producer
 
Telltale Games
Lead Environment Artist
 
Wargaming.net
Release Manager
spacer
Blogs

  Why I'm In the Cult of Far Cry 2
by Andrew Vanden Bossche on 12/13/11 06:04:00 pm   Featured Blogs
8 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
The following blog was, unless otherwise noted, independently written by a member of Gamasutra's game development community. The thoughts and opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Gamasutra or its parent company.

Want to write your own blog post on Gamasutra? It's easy! Click here to get started. Your post could be featured on Gamasutra's home page, right alongside our award-winning articles and news stories.
 

 

 

 

1
It goes a little bit like this: I'm playing the sort of game in which you shoot a lot of people through someone else's eyes and it's all very exciting and then I see a building off in the distance and know I can't go there; it's just the background. In Doom and older games like it, the background would have literally been a 2D image, wrapped in a sphere around the universe of the 3D level, not unlike the set of a play or black and white film. In the lull right before/after a firefight all I can think about is wandering over there, where it's quiet.


2
It's very likely there will be a rock in front of you and you can't jump on that rock. Far Cry 2 lets you jump on that rock. Wandering means reaching what you can see.


3
The fundamental lie of the war game is the same as the war film, which is that war travels a line, that war is a story. The storyteller lies so that reality will move in lines with characters and plots and beginnings and endings, because humans compute lines more effectively than reality. In war (but not just in war) lines are dangerous; war is too big and awful to fit in a line.


4
Apocalypse Now doesn't spin a story. Apocalypse Now tells stories, plural. The soldiers go down the river and one crazy thing happens after another, like they're wandering through the sets of a dozen different war films, like they're guests in someone else's movies. This breaks all the rules. You can't get away without lines in novels or films. Stories are supposed to have beginnings, middles, and ends. People change and grow and overcome. They don't stay confused. They don't watch a bunch of things happen to other people. They don't wander around and suddenly die for no reason, because some lucky asshole they didn't see shot them. But in Apocalypse Now, it happens just like that.

 

5
When game critics complain about linear games, sometimes I agree, but not because games and films are different.

 

6
You can't get away without lines in games, either. There's not a beginning, middle, and an end like the movies, yet there still is a beginning, middle, and end. You start the mission, then there's some conflict, then you figure it out and kill them, and then the mission's over. Beginning, middle, end, even in Tetris, even in Grand Theft Auto, in every single game those lines are everywhere. And Far Cry 2's just like that too.

 

7
Except in Far Cry 2 a jeep comes out of nowhere and runs you off the road, full of crazy people you've never met with guns who all want you to die. The tires scream and the bullets fly but because you'e safe in the living room you have a moment to think, and because nothing happens without a reason, you start thinking about why, where the hell did they come from, what the hell do they want, what is happening within the brains of those people, mercenaries or freedom fighters or just assholes with a jeep and some guns, that makes them want to kill more than everything else in the world? They've got no reason not to kill you. So maybe that's it. The answer is locked up in their heads, whatever it is, and you'll never know because the only way this ends is with them dead or you dead.

 

8
Reasons they could have to kill you:

 

Need guns

Need a car

Need medicine

Need ammo

Want diamonds

Bored

Hate you

 

9
I know nothing's going through their heads. They're polygons, they're AI scripts, but have some imagination. When you watch Apocalypse Now, do you think about what Marlin Brando's thinking or what that monstrosity of a man in the jungles of Vietnam is thinking? Maybe you do, but thinking about what's in the actor's head is like thinking about what was in the programer's head. It's how they made the story, not what the story is.

 

10
Apocalypse Now moves in a line, but it's a fucked up line.


11
In Far Cry 2 your shit falls apart. You have to kick your car to start it. Your guns jam. Your flamethrower breaks down. This doesn't need to happen, because this is a fucking video game, and in Far Cry 2 such staples of human existence such as eating and drinking are fairly well ignored. As in life, nothing in a game happens for no reason.

 In this case, the reason is so that your gun will fail when you need it the most, so that when you run our of ammo in your rifle and switch to  your sidearm, that piece of shit will jam too. Because in Far Cry 2 you are always fighting. There is nothing in the game but fighting and running, and because of that, everything you take you will eventually lose. You pick up a gun and  throw it away when it jams. You take guns from dead people because you need more and they're dead. You take things because even at your highest point, pockets full of medicine and morphine and bullets, when they hit you with the molotov as you barrel through the checkpoint, you're going to lose it all. The only permanence is the state of uncertainty. Are you going to get away this time? Or are you running straight into another camp of them?


12
War is a place. We go to war, as in, war is a place you can visit. You can drive through war, or ride a boat through it. There's a war in Iraq, yet Iraq is also still somehow a place that can be visited. Baghdad is a city and people live there. In the center of Far Cry 2 is a small town with a church and bar. In Apocalypse Now they airlift in Playboy Bunnies and go surfing. 



 
 
Comments

Paul Szczepanek
profile image
The only thing more jarring than the comparison between a mediocre game and a brilliant film is the unnecessary profanity in this article. I'm no prude but I don't like profanity used for its own sake, as if it was punctuation.

Prashanth KP
profile image
I totally agree with you about the profanity, but "a mediocre game"...?? A lot of people in this world and each will have a different opinion.. I never usually comment, but I had to respond to this..



But still, "a mediocre game"?? :)



I feel it was so much more. I still miss the world of Far Cry 2 and want to re-download the game on steam and just play it again..! I loved the way my friends would come save me, when I was about to die, searching for the hidden diamonds, trying to find what this "Jackal" person is all about, etc..



It may not have made profits like COD MW series, but the game was awesome!

Paul Szczepanek
profile image
Of course every person's taste differs but we can at least measure the impact of a game fairly objectively (even if not accurately). Maybe it's a good game, maybe it's a bad game but it didn't exactly make a splash or have any long lasting appeal or influence, did it? I'd venture to say people will still be watching Apocalypse Now in 10 years' time and playing, say Half-Life. More importantly they both have become part of the film and gaming vocabulary, they are milestones used to describe the evolution of the medium. Far Cry 2? Not so much.



There are people who prefix everything with IMHO - I think it's redundant. All the opinions I state are mine and humble unless I claim they're facts and provide sources.

Manuel Mestre-Valdes
profile image
I love to read articles like this one about FarCry 2 as for me it has been one of the best games I've played this generation. I remember reading the reviews of this game after I played it, and thinking how most of the reviewers seemed to miss the point of the game.



Articles like this one make it justice.



Regarding the inclusion of Apocalypse Now in the article, I read it more like a way of trying to explain to the reader the feelings you get when playing Far Cry2. No need to discuss "what's better".

Cody Steffen
profile image
I appreciated the cursing. Good on you, sir.



I think the Apocalypse Now comparison makes sense because the Jackal in FC2 was obviously inspired by Brando's character in the movie. If you haven't already, please ignore the snarky comments taking you to task for your cursing. The comparison is a valid one and I didn't at any point think that you were comparing the quality or importance of FC2 and Apocalypse Now.

Walker Hardin
profile image
I wonder what it says about me that I didn't even notice the profanity until I read the first comment.



Here's a post about my recent experience with Far Cry 2...



http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/WalkerHardin/20111215/9114/Back_to_Africa.php



Though, maybe I should caution that it also contains profanity.

Joe Webb
profile image
good point about respawns in sandbox games (same problem in Dead Island; weird given the nature of these games and how they should be about unpredictability)

Joe Webb
profile image
FC2; equally intriguing and frustrating. open enough to allow you to make your own story (as these games should be). I enjoyed the lengthy, overly hard missions, but I just never felt like there was anything motivating me to get to the next bit. it's a difficult balance. we want games where play itself is the story but linear story exposition can also be a motivating factor in making us continue to play. I'll never complete my copy of FC2.


none
 
Comment:
 




 
UBM Tech